Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 17 de 17
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Lipidol ; 17(6): 828-833, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37957050

RESUMO

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with atherogenic dyslipidemia and an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Previous studies have suggested an inverse relationship between NAFLD severity and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level, but contemporary data from the U.S. are lacking. Lp(a), lipid profile, apolipoproteins, and nuclear magnetic resonance-based lipoprotein particle concentrations were measured in 151 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD. Levels were compared between those with nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) on histology and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Median age was 55 [48, 62] years, 67% of patients were women, 83% were White, 43% had NAFL, and 57% had NASH. Triglyceride level was higher and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) was lower among those with NASH as compared with NAFL. Circulating apolipoprotein-B (ApoB) and low-density lipoprotein particle concentration (LDL-P) were 9% and 17% higher in the NASH group as compared with NAFL, respectively. Contrastingly, Lp(a) concentration was 50% lower in NASH relative to NAFL group. Hepatocyte ballooning, lobular inflammation, and fibrosis on histology were inversely associated with Lp(a) concentration. NAFLD severity has a discordant association with Lp(a) and other markers of atherogenic dyslipidemia. This relationship may have implications for prognosticating cardiovascular disease risk in patients with NAFLD.


Assuntos
Dislipidemias , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/complicações , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/patologia , Lipoproteína(a) , Inflamação/complicações , HDL-Colesterol , Dislipidemias/complicações , Dislipidemias/patologia , Fígado/patologia
2.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 82(9): 833-955, 2023 08 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37480922

RESUMO

AIM: The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease." METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. STRUCTURE: This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost-value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.


Assuntos
Cardiologia , Doença das Coronárias , Cardiopatias , Isquemia Miocárdica , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Antígeno Nuclear de Célula em Proliferação , American Heart Association , Doença Crônica
3.
Support Care Cancer ; 31(8): 450, 2023 Jul 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37421495

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess oncologists' responsibility, comfort, and knowledge managing hyperglycemia in patients undergoing chemotherapy. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a questionnaire collected oncologists' perceptions about professionals responsible for managing hyperglycemia during chemotherapy; comfort (score range 12-120); and knowledge (score range 0-16). Descriptive statistics were calculated including Student t-tests and one-way ANOVA for mean score differences. Multivariable linear regression identified predictors of comfort and knowledge scores. RESULTS: Respondents (N = 229) were 67.7% men, 91.3% White and mean age 52.1 years. Oncologists perceived endocrinologists/diabetologists and primary care physicians as those responsible for managing hyperglycemia during chemotherapy, and most frequently referred to these clinicians. Reasons for referral included lack of time to manage hyperglycemia (62.4%), belief that patients would benefit from referral to an alternative provider clinician (54.1%), and not perceiving hyperglycemia management in their scope of practice (52.4%). The top-3 barriers to patient referral were long wait times for primary care (69.9%) and endocrinology (68.1%) visits, and patient's provider outside of the oncologist's institution (52.8%). The top-3 barriers to treating hyperglycemia were lack of knowledge about when to start insulin, how to adjust insulin, and what insulin type works best. Women (ß = 1.67, 95% CI: 0.16, 3.18) and oncologists in suburban areas (ß = 6.98, 95% CI: 2.53, 11.44) had higher comfort scores than their respective counterparts; oncologists working in practices with > 10 oncologists had lower comfort scores (ß = -2.75, 95% CI: -4.96, -0.53) than those in practices with ≤ 10. No significant predictors were identified for knowledge. CONCLUSION: Oncologists expected endocrinology or primary care clinicians to manage hyperglycemia during chemotherapy, but long wait times were among the top barriers cited when referring patients. New models that provide prompt and coordinated care are needed.


Assuntos
Hiperglicemia , Insulinas , Neoplasias , Oncologistas , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Transversais , Oncologia , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Hiperglicemia/induzido quimicamente , Hiperglicemia/prevenção & controle , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Padrões de Prática Médica
4.
Circulation ; 148(9): e9-e119, 2023 08 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37471501

RESUMO

AIM: The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease." METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. STRUCTURE: This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost-value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.


Assuntos
Cardiologia , Doença das Coronárias , Isquemia Miocárdica , Humanos , American Heart Association , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Antígeno Nuclear de Célula em Proliferação , Estados Unidos
5.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 162(2): e183-e353, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33972115
7.
Pharm Pract (Granada) ; 18(3): 2160, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33029264

RESUMO

The United States (US) has a complex healthcare system with a mix of public, private, nonprofit, and for-profit insurers, healthcare institutions and organizations, and providers. Unlike other developed countries, there is not a single payer healthcare system or a national pharmaceutical benefits scheme/plan. Despite spending over USD 10,000 per capita in healthcare, the US is among the worst performers compared to other developed countries in outcomes including life expectancy at birth, infant mortality, safety during childbirth, and unmanaged chronic conditions (e.g., asthma, diabetes). Primary care is delivered by physicians and advanced practice providers (i.e., nurse practitioners and physician assistants) in a variety of settings including large health systems, federally qualified health centers or free clinics that provide care to the underserved, or specific facilities for veterans or American Indian and Alaska native peoples. Since 2010, primary care delivery has shifted toward providing patient-centered, coordinated, comprehensive care focused on providing proactive, rather than reactive, population health management, and on the quality, versus volume, of care. Community pharmacy comprises a mix of independently owned, chain, supermarket and mass merchant pharmacies. Community pharmacies provide services such as immunizations, medication therapy management, medication packaging, medication synchronization, point-of-care testing and, in specific states where legislation has been passed, hormonal contraception, opioid reversal agents, and smoking cessation services. There has been criticism regarding the lack of standard terminology for services such as medication synchronization and medication therapy management, their components and how they should be provided, which hampers comparability across studies. One of the main challenges for pharmacists in the US is the lack of provider status at the federal level. This means that pharmacists are not allowed to use existing fee-for-service health insurance billing codes to receive reimbursement for non-dispensing services. In addition, despite there being regulatory infrastructure in multiple states, the extent of service implementation is either low or unknown. Research found that pharmacists face numerous barriers when providing some of these services. State fragmentation and the lack of a single pharmacy organization and vision for the profession are additional challenges.

8.
Pharmacogenomics ; 21(9): 627-635, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32425117

RESUMO

Older adults are at high risk for inappropriate prescribing, developing polypharmacy, adverse drug events and poor treatment outcomes due to multimorbidity and geriatric syndromes. Pharmacogenomics could allow healthcare professionals to provide optimal patient care while minimizing the risk of adverse drug events and simplifying complex medication regimens. The implementation of pharmacogenomics in geriatrics medicine requires a broad multilayered bottom-up approach. These include curriculum redesign, rethinking experiential education and patient and provider education. There are barriers associated with adopting pharmacogenomics into clinical practice. These barriers may include economic factors, workflow and informatics support. However, addressing these barriers primarily requires creating a culture of innovative practices in patient care, ongoing interprofessional continuing education and an interdisciplinary approach for patient care.


Assuntos
Prescrições de Medicamentos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Farmacogenética/métodos , Polimedicação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/tendências , Multimorbidade/tendências , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/tendências , Farmacogenética/tendências
10.
Kidney Int Rep ; 5(2): 199-210, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32043034

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Although chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased risk for coronary artery disease (CAD), the underlying mechanisms are not completely defined. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that flux of cholesterol from macrophage foam cells to liver is impaired in subjects with CKD. METHODS: Consecutive healthy patients, patients with at least 1 CAD risk factor, patients with established CAD, and patients with CKD stages G3 to G5 (n ≥ 15/group) were recruited prospectively. The ability of total patient serum without any modifications to (i) facilitate efflux of cholesterol from human THP1-macrophage foam cells under physiological conditions (cholesterol efflux capacity [CEC]) and (ii) to deliver this effluxed cholesterol to primary hepatocytes with physiological expression of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) receptor SR-BI (capacity to deliver cholesterol to hepatocytes [CDCH]) was evaluated. RESULTS: Although healthy patients, patients with at least 1 CAD risk factor, and patients with established CAD all showed similar CEC, patients with CKD showed significantly higher CEC. CDCH was significantly lower in all groups compared with the healthy patients; however, when corrected for higher CEC, CDCH in patients with CKD was significantly lower than in patients with CAD. CDCH correlated with age, body mass index, metabolic parameters, inflammatory markers, and kidney function markers (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], serum creatinine, and serum cystatin C). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that aberrations in delivery of cholesterol effluxed from macrophage foam cells to liver for final elimination or the last step of reverse cholesterol transport, may underlie the increased risk of CAD in patients with CKD.

11.
Diabetes Technol Ther ; 22(1): 10-18, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31436480

RESUMO

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are highly effective at lowering hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and facilitating weight loss. Four agents in the GLP-1 RA class, albiglutide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, and semaglutide, also have cardioprotective effects. However, subcutaneous administration of these agents remains a major reason for their underutilization. A new coformulation of semaglutide with sodium N-[8-(2-hydroxybenzoyl) amino caprylate (SNAC) is the first oral GLP-1 RA reviewed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The SNAC technology prevents destruction of semaglutide in the stomach and facilitates transcellular absorption through the gastric membrane enabling semaglutide to reach systemic circulation intact. The oral formulation of semaglutide was studied in the PIONEER trials, demonstrating similar efficacy to the presently available GLP-1 RAs with regard to HbA1c lowering and weight loss. Although the PIONEER 6 trial suggests positive effects on cardiovascular mortality with oral semaglutide, these benefits may not fully be appreciated until the completion of the SOUL trial.


Assuntos
Caprilatos/farmacocinética , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 1/agonistas , Peptídeos Semelhantes ao Glucagon/administração & dosagem , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos , Peptídeos Semelhantes ao Glucagon/farmacocinética , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/farmacocinética , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/etiologia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/prevenção & controle
13.
J Clin Lipidol ; 13(4): 525-537, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31281070
14.
Curr Atheroscler Rep ; 20(6): 29, 2018 05 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29766349

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review examines recent randomized clinical trials evaluating the role of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) in the management of coronary heart disease. RECENT FINDINGS: CoQ10 is one of the most commonly used dietary supplements in the USA. Due to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, CoQ10 has been studied extensively for possible use in managing coronary heart disease. One of the most common applications of CoQ10 is to mitigate statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) based on the theory that SAMS are caused by statin depletion of CoQ10 in the muscle. Although previous studies of CoQ10 for SAMS have produced mixed results, CoQ10 appears to be safe. Because CoQ10 is a cofactor in the generation of adenosine triphosphate, supplementation has also recently been studied in patients with heart failure, which is inherently an energy deprived state. The Q-SYMBIO trial found that CoQ10 supplementation in patients with heart failure not only improved functional capacity, but also significantly reduced cardiovascular events and mortality. Despite these positive findings, a larger prospective trial is warranted to support routine use of CoQ10. Less impressive are the effects of CoQ10 on specific cardiovascular risk factors such as blood pressure, dyslipidemia, and glycemic control. Current evidence does not support routine use of CoQ10 in patients with coronary heart disease. Additional studies are warranted to fully determine the benefit of CoQ10 in patients with heart failure before including it in guideline-directed medical therapy.


Assuntos
Antioxidantes/uso terapêutico , Doença das Coronárias/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/efeitos adversos , Doenças Musculares/tratamento farmacológico , Ubiquinona/análogos & derivados , Antioxidantes/farmacologia , Glicemia/metabolismo , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Doença Crônica , Doença das Coronárias/fisiopatologia , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/etiologia , Suplementos Nutricionais , Dislipidemias/tratamento farmacológico , Dislipidemias/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Doenças Musculares/induzido quimicamente , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Ubiquinona/farmacologia , Ubiquinona/uso terapêutico
15.
Pharmacotherapy ; 36(3): 342-7, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26917116

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a pharmacist-physician collaborative practice model (PPCPM) to improve long-term blood pressure (BP) control rates in a primarily African-American underserved urban population. PRACTICE INNOVATION: Volunteer physicians established initial diagnoses, whereas pharmacists provided most (more than 70%) of the medication management. During each scheduled visit, the pharmacist reconciled the medication list, completed a clinical interview, conducted a focused physical examination, developed and implemented a treatment plan, and provided documentation in a shared medical record. EVALUATION: A retrospective chart review was performed to collect data for a longitudinal cohort of patients managed by the PPCPM from 2010-2013. RESULTS: Of 385 patients with at least two pharmacist visits during 2009, 172 patients received continuous care over the study period. At baseline, the mean age of the cohort was 51.3 years, 62% were female, and 76% were African-American. Approximately 65% were obese (body mass index 30 kg/m(2) or higher), and 39% were cigarette smokers. Mean baseline BP was 156/98 mm Hg, with only 17% of the cohort at their BP goal of lower than 140/90 mm Hg. The BP control rate improved to 66% during the first year and persisted throughout the study period, with 68% of patients at goal in 2013 (p<0.05 compared with baseline). CONCLUSION: The PPCPM BP control rate ranks in the 90th percentile of National Committee for Quality Assurance benchmarks and was superior even to the 2013 reported mean for commercial insurers. The PPCPM effectively improved hypertension control in an uninsured, primarily African-American, urban population despite significant health barriers. Key elements of this asynchronous care model included access to a common medical record, optimization of distinct interprofessional roles, frequent follow-up with evaluation, and collaborative practice agreement with sufficient scope of practice to implement medication changes at the time of the visit.


Assuntos
Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Farmacêuticos/organização & administração , Padrões de Prática Médica/organização & administração , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Estudos de Coortes , Comportamento Cooperativo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos , Modelos Teóricos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Virginia
16.
Heart Fail Clin ; 11(1): 117-24, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25432480

RESUMO

Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome of breathlessness, lower extremity swelling, fatigue, and exercise intolerance affecting a large portion of the population worldwide, and associated with premature death. Despite improvement in the management of HF, many patients remain unable to complete activities of daily living without experiencing exertional symptoms. Although prevention of death in patients with HF is imperative, treatment of symptoms and improving functional capacity are equally important goals. This article discusses treatments (medical and surgical) associated with improved functional capacity in HF.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Cardiotônicos/farmacologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Função Ventricular/fisiologia , Teste de Esforço , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Humanos
17.
J Cardiovasc Nurs ; 29(5): E7-E12, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24231894

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant disorder caused primarily by mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene. Familial hypercholesterolemia is characterized by exceedingly high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and subsequent premature coronary heart disease. Homozygous FH (HoFH) is less prevalent, but more severe, than heterozygous FH. Current treatment options include dietary therapy, lipid-lowering agents (eg, statins), and/or LDL-C apheresis. PURPOSE: Despite the available treatment options, patients with FH rarely attain treatment goals. This review will focus on 2 novel agents, lomitapide and mipomersen, with recently approved US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeling for use in patients with HoFH. CONCLUSIONS: Lomitapide and mipomersen are 2 agents with novel mechanisms of action and the ability to significantly lower LDL-C, apolipoprotein B, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. A black box warning exists for lomitapide and mipomersen regarding the risk for transaminase elevations and hepatic steatosis. Furthermore, these agents are currently restricted for use only in patients with HoFH and have been required by the FDA to participate in a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These new agents offer additional treatment options for clinicians managing patients with HoFH, but it remains uncertain whether lomitapide and mipomersen will gain FDA approval for use in patients with heterozygous FH or in the general population. Cost and concern for the risk for hepatotoxicity will remain limiting factors to these agents being more widely used.


Assuntos
Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapêutico , Benzimidazóis/uso terapêutico , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/tratamento farmacológico , Oligonucleotídeos/uso terapêutico , Anticolesterolemiantes/economia , Anticolesterolemiantes/farmacocinética , Anticolesterolemiantes/farmacologia , Benzimidazóis/economia , Benzimidazóis/farmacocinética , Benzimidazóis/farmacologia , Humanos , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/economia , Fígado/efeitos dos fármacos , Oligonucleotídeos/economia , Oligonucleotídeos/farmacocinética , Oligonucleotídeos/farmacologia , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA